Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Flying under Wires

I had an unnerving dream this morning about 5:00 AM. I can’t blame it on anything pharmacological, Ray, or anything I ate. I was in an airplane taking off from an airstrip someplace out in the country. Another plane came alongside. I was afraid there was going to be a collision, but the other plane veered off and ascended out of sight. Then the plane I was riding in flew under some electrical wires hanging from telephone poles. We got past the wires, but we didn’t ascend. It became apparent that there were more wires to fly under, so it was a good thing the pilot had not tried to climb. As soon as we passed under these wires, there were more poles and wires. We didn’t hit any wires, but as far as I could see there were more poles and wires. We continued to fly at low altitude. There seemed no end to this. The wires were a menace. I felt only dread that this was the trajectory for the foreseeable future. It was a dream world subjected to futility.

Some months ago I began posting these essays under the heading still visible above: Alienated in Church. At the time this blog was a monologue. The earliest comment is still there, accusing me of being a Luddite and an elitist snob.

Most of my life I’ve been a Christian and for nearly as many years I’ve been a church musician. I have tried to think of church as a place where it is just as important to contribute something as to benefit in the various ways people benefit from church attendance. I invested considerable time and money in a master’s degree in theology, thinking that since the church has my heart, I might find a place to work productively in some aspect of ministry. It has become more and more apparent that what I have to offer is not much in demand in the currently fashionable ministries of the church.

I earn a good living in technology. My wife doesn’t have to work to keep us financially solvent. It would seem that we have time and skills that could be put to good use on a volunteer basis in church. For the past ten years or so, in several different churches, we have encountered clergymen, and others guarding their turf, who don’t want us to do much. I joke about being able to sing in the Episcopal Church but not to speak. As long as I have been at my current church, even while I was a member of the vestry, the rector and I have never had a disagreement. This is because he does most of the talking. I don’t have many opportunities to contradict him.

I ended up in the Episcopal Church on the rebound from a conservative Presbyterian Church five blocks away in downtown Seattle where I was a section leader in the choir. They fired me on the basis of an essay I read in a Sunday School class. It’s posted here in the April archive under the title Reformation Sunday. In retrospect it doesn’t seem an inflammatory piece, but several people with influence were offended by it and by my interest in having a discussion about music that they wanted to get behind them.

I had ended up in the Presbyterian Church on the rebound from the Catholic Church where I was confirmed. There the priest, who admitted he hated musicians, decided I wouldn’t be a cantor anymore because I sang too loud. The church was a big as an airplane hanger, but my operatic sound was objectionable to some. The church also had a marvelous organ that Father G. said the people “hated”. Interestingly enough, Father G. was a traditionalist. If, occasionally, somebody who had been involved in charismatic worship somewhere else raised their hands in praise, Father G. had given the ushers instructions, and they were escorted out. We didn’t do worship that way at St. Alphonsus. The church had a pretty good choir with salaried section leaders. That’s, of course, how I had ended up there.

Church has been controversial in my family since before I was born. My father is Italian and my mother Norwegian. Maybe it’s fitting that I’ve been hanging out in Henry the Eighth’s compromised Episcopal Church where, if I choose, I can hear Native American drumming and, probably, soon Hindu chant. I’m singing again, occasionally, in the Catholic Church. I mean, it’s fine to be inclusive, but I’ve already been in a heterosexual minority in the opera world. I’ve heard it said that networking is fine if you’re in the network and not so fine when you’re not. The Episcopal Church seems intent on following Tony Kushner’s motif in making homosexuals moral exemplars for our time, angels, no less, in America. I saw the first of the Kushner’s plays, so I may have to opt out for the reprise in church.

That brings me back to square one and the first post in this blog back in March:

Feeling a little strange in church these days?
Like you better not say what you think?
Guitars drive you up the walls?
Tired of Bush bashing jokes?
Of being organized out of the picture?

Maybe you need an AA meeting

Alienated Anonymous
Is for people who think church could be great
If everybody who wanted to got to talk
And not just sit and listen
If you could sing a four part hymn
And not be drummed into oblivion
By amplified choruses

I won’t go deaf listening to amplified choruses in the Episcopal Church, but I am often organized out the picture, and I wish I had a dollar for every Bush bashing joke I’ve heard. For people who trumpet their tolerance, Episcopalians are also noticeably intolerant of Evangelicals. My dilemma has not changed much. Mainline churches tend to follow postmodernism in ethics while conservative churches follow the pop-culture equivalent in their styles of worship. Even the Catholic Church sings mostly a musical derivative of the 1960s era of our enlightenment.
There is some consolation in knowing that Jesus was a misfit among the religious majorities of his time. Maybe he didn’t sing. Sometimes I think I’ll continue to sing only in the shower.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

OK Mike, feel better now. Try a little peyote with that Native American music.

Anonymous said...

Seems that life is full of tradeoffs. I guess bottom line is, in my opinion, the first criteria for choosing a church would be its theological position. Of course choice of music could be an indicator of their theology. The church I belong to takes a strong theological stand and is conservative musically, even though the music may not be on the level I would prefer.

Anonymous said...

Mike--

You're in the wrong church. The Epicopalians have had "culture" for years, but Christianity is secondary to them, and is now a thing to trade off for party politics. It has always been PC for some agenda--it began, after all, as a result of an adulterous affair (Henry VIII)!

It is a waste of time to stay there. Their political positions are more important to them than any Christian theological ones. Because they are shutting you out, you will not be able to make them see the errors of their ways. They will only drag you down, make you compromise in little ways until you've compromised in big ways. Flee temptation. They've chosen their path. You don't have to ride it down with them.

There truly is better worship music elsewhere and true worship. To have that music, it's not necessary to put up with so much un-Christian and anti-Christian nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Scribe, I assume that is you that posted above. Pretty strong statement and people say us Fundamentalists (I actually avoid that term normally) are intolerant of other faiths. But, I have to agree with everything you said.

Anonymous said...

Scribe, not that I disagree with you, but I think we must be careful when deciding to take a different course that goes against the grain. Many cults started that way.

Mike, start your own church... the First Church of Mozart. OK, I'll admit, Scribe is poet among us so that leaves the wiseguy role to me. That goes with being a bass trombonist.

BTW Scribe, I have read many of your posts on the Image Forum over the past several months. I was a lurker and posted a couple times last summer.

Anonymous said...

A little off topic, but still in the ballpark. I went to a Christmas concert put on by a local Christian Day School - several students are from my church. I was both encouraged and discouraged. Encouraged that in a small school they are able to have such a program to include an elementary band, HS bands and choirs. I taught music at this school for 2 years back in the dark ages and was able to get nothing more than a small wind ensemble along with the choirs.

I was discouraged with the selection of music. Being a Christian school, I would expect our future leaders to come out of it. When the HS students had their turn, the stage band was first. They started off with a Christmas carol that was only lacking a pole dancer - music right out of a night club or worse. It actually had that beat and we won't talk about the blonde drummer. BTW, I've never darkened the doors to that kind of establishment, just observation flipping through the channels on the TV. Next was the full band. The director being trained primarily in jazz had them playing (drum roll)... mostly jazz. I should add, the concert was held in a Baptist church. The closest piece they played that could be called decent music was Leroy Anderson's, "Bugler's Holiday".

Then we wonder why the kids don't appreciate Bach and Handel and Mozart or even solid hymnody. It's like their musical literature never rises much above "Dick and Jane... see Spot run...".

Michael Dodaro said...

Interesting quip I found this morning. Jason, you might appreciate this one: The difference between a church music director and a terrorist is that one might negotiate with a terrorist.

Anonymous said...

I just read about 80% of that article about organizing worship. I have to agree with Jason, it seemed more like a formula for producing a variety show on TV.

Anonymous said...

Scribe, you're cracking me up. "...stand under various cones..." reminds me of the cones of silence from that highly intellectual 60s sitcom, Get Smart.